Diagnostic performance of qfr for the evaluation of intermediate coronary artery stenosis confirmed by fractional flow reserve

Abstract Introduction: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel method enabling efficient computation of FFR from three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D QCA) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame counting. We decided to perform a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of the literature to determine the correlation between the diagnosis of functionally significant stenosis obtained by QFR versus FFR and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of QFR for intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies concerning the diagnostic performance of QFR. Our meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The sROC was used to determine diagnostic test accuracy. Results: Nine studies consisting of 1175 vessels in 1047 patients were included in our study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR-, and DOR for QFR were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), 6.86 (95% CI,: 5.22-9.02), 0.14 (95% CI: 0.10-0.21), and 53.05 (95% CI: 29.75-94.58), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve for QFR was 0.94. Conclusion: QFR is a simple, useful, and noninvasive modality for diagnosis of functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenosis.

Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of FFR Compared with Angiography in Multivessel Disease Patient / Impacto Clínico e Custo-Efetividade da FFR em Comparação à Angiografia em Pacientes com Doenças Multiarteriais Submetidos à ICP

Abstract Background: In multivessel disease patients with moderate stenosis, fractional flow reserve (FFR) allows the analysis of the lesions and guides treatment, and could contribute to the cost-effectiveness (CE) of non-pharmacological stents (NPS). Objectives: To evaluate CE and clinical impact of FFR-guided versus angiography-guided angioplasty (ANGIO) in multivessel patients using NPS. Methods: Multivessel disease patients were prospectively randomized to FFR or ANGIO groups during a 5 year-period and followed for < 12 months. Outcomes measures were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), restenosis and CE. Results: We studied 69 patients, 47 (68.1%) men, aged 62.0 ± 9.0 years, 34 (49.2%) in FFR group and 53 (50.7%) in ANGIO group, with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome. In FFR, there were 26 patients with biarterial disease (76.5%) and 8 (23.5%) with triarterial disease, and in ANGIO, 24 (68.6%) with biarterial and 11 (31.4%) with triarterial disease. Twelve MACEs were observed - 3 deaths: 2 (5.8%) in FFR and 1 (2.8%) in ANGIO, 9 (13.0%) angina: 4(11.7%) in FFR and 5(14.2%) in ANGIO, 6 restenosis: 2(5.8%) in FFR and 4 (11.4%) in ANGIO. Angiography detected 87(53.0%) lesions in FFR, 39(23.7%) with PCI and 48(29.3%) with medical treatment; and 77 (47.0%) lesions in ANGIO, all treated with angioplasty. Thirty-nine (33.3%) stents were registered in FFR (0.45 ± 0.50 stents/lesion) and 78 (1.05 ± 0.22 stents/lesion) in ANGIO (p = 0.0001), 51.4% greater in ANGIO than FFR. CE analysis revealed a cost of BRL 5,045.97 BRL 5,430.60 in ANGIO and FFR, respectively. The difference of effectiveness was of 1.82%. Conclusion: FFR reduced the number of lesions treated and stents, and the need for target-lesion revascularization, with a CE comparable with that of angiography.

Resumo Fundamentos: Em pacientes multiarteriais e lesões moderadas, a reserva de fluxo fracionada (FFR) avalia cada lesão e direciona o tratamento, podendo ser útil no custo-efetividade (CE) de implante de stents não farmacológicos (SNF). Objetivos: Avaliar CE e impacto clínico da angioplastia + FFR versus angioplastia + angiografia (ANGIO), em multiarteriais, utilizando SNF. Métodos: pacientes com doença multiarteriais foram randomizados prospectivamente durante ±5 anos para FFR ou ANGIO, e acompanhados por até 12 meses. Foram avaliados eventos cardíacos maiores (ECAM), reestenose e CE. Resultados: foram incluídos 69 pacientes, 47(68,1%) homens, 34(49,2%) no FFR e 35(50,7%) no ANGIO, idade 62,0 ± 9,0 anos, com angina estável e Síndrome Coronariana Aguda estabilizada. No FFR, havia 26 com doença (76,5%) biarterial e 8 (23,5%) triarterial, e no grupo ANGIO, 24(68,6%) biarteriais e 11(31,4%) triarteriais. Ocorreram 12(17,3%) ECAM - 3(4,3%) óbitos: 2(5,8%) no FFR e 1(2,8%) no ANGIO, 9(13,0%) anginas, 4(11,7%) no FFR e 5(14,2%) no ANGIO, 6 reestenoses: 2(5,8%) no FFR e 4 (11,4%) no ANGIO. Angiografia detectou 87(53,0%) lesões no FFR, 39(23,7%) com ICP e 48(29,3%) com tratamento clínico; e 77(47,0%) lesões no ANGIO, todas submetidas à angioplastia. Quanto aos stents, registrou-se 39(33,3%) (0,45 ± 0,50 stents/lesão) no FFR e 78(66,6%) (1,05 ± 0,22 stents/lesão) no ANGIO (p = 0,0001); ANGIO utilizou 51,4% a mais que o FFR. Análise de CE revelou um custo de R$5045,97 e R$5.430,60 nos grupos ANGIO e FFR, respectivamente. A diferença de efetividade foi 1,82%. Conclusões: FFR diminuiu o número de lesões tratadas e de stents e necessidade de revascularização do vaso-alvo, com CE comparável ao da angiografia.

Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy in Acute Coronary Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis / Estratégia Guiada por Reserva de Fluxo Fracionada na Síndrome Coronária Aguda: Revisão Sistemática Metanálise

Abstract Background: There are limited data on the prognosis of deferral of lesion treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) based on fractional flow reserve (FFR). Objectives: To provide a systematic review of the current evidence on the prognosis of deferred lesions in ACS patients compared with deferred lesions in non-ACS patients, on the basis of FFR. Methods: We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 2000 and September 2017 that compared prognosis of deferred revascularization of lesions on the basis of FFR in ACS patients compared with non-ACS patients. We conducted a pooled relative risk meta-analysis of four primary outcomes: mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and target-vessel revascularization (TVR). Results: We identified 7 studies that included a total of 5,107 patients. A pooled meta-analysis showed no significant difference in mortality (relative risk [RR] = 1.44; 95% CI, 0.9-2.4), CV mortality (RR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.4-4.3) and TVR (RR = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.9-2.3) after deferral of revascularization based on FFR between ACS and non-ACS patients. Such deferral was associated with significant additional risk of MI (RR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.4-2.4) in ACS patients. Conclusion: The prognostic value of FFR in ACS setting is not as good as in stable patients. The results demonstrate an increased risk of MI but not of mortality, CV mortality, and TVR in ACS patients.

Resumo Fundamento: Existem dados limitados sobre o prognóstico do adiamento do tratamento das lesões em pacientes com síndrome coronária com base na reserva de fluxo fracionada (FFR). Objetivos: Realizar uma revisão sistemática da evidência atual sobre o prognóstico do adiamento do tratamento de lesões em pacientes com SCA com base na FFR, comparando-o com o prognóstico em pacientes sem SCA. Métodos: Pesquisamos as bases de dados do Medline, EMBASE, e Cochrane Library por estudos publicados entre janeiro de 2000 e setembro de 2017 que compararam o prognóstico do adiamento da revascularização das lesões com base na FFR em pacientes com SCA em comparação a pacientes sem SCA. Conduzimos uma metanálise do risco relativo de quatro desfechos primários: mortalidade, mortalidade cardiovascular, infarto do miocárdio (IM) e revascularização do vaso-alvo (TVR). Resultados: Identificamos sete estudos que incluíram um total de 5107 pacientes. A metanálise mostrou que não houve diferença quanto à mortalidade [risco relativo (RR) = 1,44; IC95%, 0,9-2,4), mortalidade cardiovascular (RR = 1,29; IC95% = 0,4-4,3) e TVR (RR = 1,46; IC95% = 0,9-2,3) após adiamento da revascularização com base na FFR entre pacientes com SCA e pacientes sem SCA. Tal adiamento foi associado com risco adicional de IM (RR = 1,83; IC95% = 1,4-2,4) em pacientes com SCA. Conclusão: O valor prognóstico da FFR na SCA não é tão bom como em pacientes estáveis. Os resultados mostram um risco aumentado de IM, mas não de mortalidade, mortalidade cardiovascular, e TVR em pacientes com SCA.

Prognostic Value of Coronary Flow Reserve Obtained on Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography and its Correlation with Target Heart Rate / Valor Prognóstico da Reserva de Fluxo Coronariano Obtida Durante o Ecocardiograma sob Estresse com Dobutamina e sua Correlação com a Frequência Cardíaca Alvo

Abstract Background: Normal coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) (≥ 2) obtained in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) from transthoracic echocardiography is associated with a good prognosis, but there is no study correlating CFVR with submaximal target heart rate (HR). Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of CFVR obtained in the LAD of patients with preserved (>50%) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who completed a dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), considering target HR. Methods: Prospective study of patients with preserved LVEF and CFVR obtained in the LAD who completed DSE. In Group I (GI = 31), normal CFVR was obtained before achieving target HR, and, in Group II (GII = 28), after that. Group III (G III=24) reached target HR, but CFVR was abnormal. Death, acute coronary insufficiency, coronary intervention, coronary angiography without further intervention, and hospitalization were considered events. Results: In 28 ± 4 months, there were 18 (21.6%) events: 6% (2/31) in GI, 18% (5/28) in GII, and 46% (11/24) in GIII. There were 4 (4.8%) deaths, 6 (7.2%) coronary interventions and 8 (9.6%) coronary angiographies without further intervention. In event-free survival by regression analysis, GIII had more events than GI (p < 0.001) and GII (p < 0.045), with no difference between GI and GII (p = 0.160). After adjustment, the only difference was between GIII and GI (p = 0.012). Conclusion: In patients with preserved LVEF and who completed their DSE, normal CFVR obtained before achieving target HR was associated with better prognosis.

Resumo Fundamento: A reserva de velocidade de fluxo coronariano (RVFC) adequada (≥ 2) obtida na artéria descendente anterior (ADA) através do ecocardiograma transtorácico associa-se a bom prognóstico, mas não há estudo correlacionando-a com a frequência cardíaca (FC) alvo (submáxima). Objetivo: Avaliar o valor prognóstico da RVFC obtida na ADA de pacientes com fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) preservada (>50%) e ecocardiograma sob estresse com dobutamina (EED) concluído, considerando a FC alvo submáxima. Métodos: studo prospectivo de pacientes com FEVE preservada e RVFC obtida na ADA durante EED concluído. No Grupo I (GI=31), a RVFC adequada foi obtida antes de se atingir a FC alvo, e no Grupo II (G II=28), após. O Grupo III (G III=24) atingiu a FC alvo, mas a RVFC foi inadequada. Foram considerados eventos: óbito, insuficiência coronariana aguda, intervenção coronariana, coronariografia sem intervenção subsequente e internamento hospitalar. Resultados: Em 28 ± 4 meses, ocorreram 18 (21,6%) eventos, sendo 6% (2/31) no GI, 18% (5/28) no GII e 46% (11/24) no GIII. Foram 4 (4,8%) óbitos, 6 (7,2%) intervenções coronarianas e 8 (9,6%) coronariografias sem intervenção subsequente. Na sobrevida livre de eventos pela análise de regressão, GIII apresentou mais eventos do que GI (p < 0,001) ou GII (p < 0,045), não havendo diferença entre GI e GII (p = 0,160). Após o ajustamento, foi mantida a diferença apenas entre GIII e GI (p = 0,012). Conclusão: Em pacientes com FEVE preservada e EED concluído, a RVFC adequada obtida antes da FC alvo associou-se ao melhor prognóstico.

Comparative Study between Perfusion Changes and Positive Findings on Coronary Flow Reserve / Estudo Comparativo entre Alterações de Perfusão e Achados Positivos da Reserva de Fluxo Coronariano

Abstract Background: Functional assessment of coronary artery obstruction is used in cardiology practice to correlate anatomic obstructions with flow decrease. Among such assessments, the study of the coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become the most widely used. Objective: To evaluate the correlation between FFR and findings of ischemia obtained by noninvasive methods including stress echocardiography and nuclear medicine and the presence of critical coronary artery obstruction. Methods: Retrospective study of cases treated with systematized and standardized procedures for coronary disease between March 2011 and August 2014. We included 96 patients with 107 critical coronary obstructions (> 50% in the coronary trunk and/or ≥ 70% in other segments) estimated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS). All cases presented ischemia in one of the noninvasive studies. Results: All 96 patients presented ischemia (100%) in one of the functional tests. On FFR study with adenosine 140 g/kg/min, 52% of the cases had values ≤ 0.80. On correlation analysis for FFR ≤ 0.80, the evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and ROC curve in relation to the stenosis degree and length, and presence of ischemia, no significant values or strong correlation were observed. Conclusion: Coronary FFR using a cut-off value of 0.80 showed no correlation with noninvasive ischemia tests in patients with severe coronary artery obstructions on QCA and ICUS.

Resumo Fundamento: A avaliação funcional da obstrução arterial coronariana é empregada na prática cardiológica para correlacionar a obstrução anatômica e a queda de fluxo. Dentre as formas de avaliação, o estudo da reserva fracionada de fluxo (RFF) coronariano se tornou a mais utilizada. Objetivo: Avaliar a correlação entre a RFF com achados de isquemia, obtidos por métodos não invasivos como a ecocardiografia de estresse ou medicina nuclear, e a presença de obstrução crítica da artéria coronária. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de casos tratados com procedimentos sistematizados e padronizados para doença coronariana entre março de 2011 e agosto de 2014. Foram incluídos 96 pacientes com 107 obstruções coronarianas críticas (> 50% no tronco da coronária e/ou ≥ 70% nos demais segmentos) estimadas por angiografia coronariana quantitativa (ACQ) e ultrassonografia intracoronariana (USIC). Todos os casos apresentaram isquemia em um dos estudos não invasivos. Resultados: Ao estudo da RFF com adenosina na dose de 140 µg/kg/min, valores ≤ 0,80 foram encontrados em 52% dos casos. Na análise de correlação para RFF ≤ 0,80, avaliando-se sensibilidade/especificidade, valor preditivo positivo/negativo, acurácia e curva ROC em relação ao grau de estenose, extensão da estenose e presença de isquemia, não foram observados valores de significância ou de forte correlação. Conclusão: A RFF coronariana a um valor de corte de 0,80 não apresentou correlação com testes não invasivos de isquemia em pacientes com obstruções coronarianas graves à ACQ e USIC.

Intraoperative analysis of flow dynamics in arteriovenous composite y grafts

Abstract Objective: Composite graft of left internal thoracic artery and great saphenous vein in revascularization of the left coronary system is a technique well described in literature. The aim of this study is to analyze blood flow dynamics in this configuration of composite graft especially in what concerns left internal thoracic artery's adaptability and influence of great saphenous vein segment on left internal thoracic artery's flow. Methods: Revascularization of left coronary system with composite graft, with left internal thoracic artery revascularizing the anterior interventricular artery and a great saphenous vein segment, anastomosed to the left internal thoracic artery, revascularizing another branch of the left coronary system, was performed in 23 patients. Blood flow was evaluated by transit time flowmetry in all segments of the composite graft (left internal thoracic artery proximal segment, left internal thoracic artery distal segment and great saphenous vein segment). Measures were performed in baseline condition and after dobutamine-induced stress, without and with non-traumatic temporary clamping of the distal segments of the composite graft. Results: Pharmacological stress resulted in increase of blood flow values in the analyzed segments (P<0.05). Non-traumatic temporary clamping of great saphenous vein segment did not result in statistically significant changes in the flow of left internal thoracic artery distal segment, both in baseline condition and under pharmacological stress. Similarly, non-traumatic temporary clamping of left internal thoracic artery distal segment did not result in statistically significant changes in great saphenous vein segment flow. Conclusion: Composite grafts with left internal thoracic artery and great saphenous vein for revascularization of left coronary system, resulted in blood flow dynamics with physiological adaptability, both at rest and after pharmacological stress, according to demand. Presence of great saphenous vein segment did not alter physiological blood flow dynamics in distal segment of left internal thoracic artery.

Myocardial blood flow assessment with 82rubidium-PET imaging in patients with left bundle branch block

OBJECTIVES: Perfusion abnormalities are frequently seen in Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) when a left bundle branch block is present. A few studies have shown decreased coronary flow reserve in the left anterior descending territory, regardless of the presence of coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography imaging in the assessment of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with left bundle branch block (GI), median age 63.5 years, 22 (58%) female, 12 with coronary artery disease (≥70%; GI-A) and 26 with no evidence of significant coronary artery disease (GI-B), underwent rest-dipyridamole stress 82Rb-positron emission tomography with absolute quantitative flow measurements using Cedars-Sinai software (mL/min/g). The relative myocardial perfusion and left ventricular ejection fraction were assessed in 17 segments. These parameters were compared with those obtained from 30 patients with normal 82Rb-positron emission tomography studies and without left bundle branch block (GII). RESULTS: Stress myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve were significantly lower in GI than in GII (p<0.05). The comparison of coronary flow reserve between GI-A and GI-B showed that it was different from the global coronary flow reserve (p<0.05) and the stress flow was significantly lower in the anterior than in the septal wall for both groups. Perfusion abnormalities were more prevalent in GI-A (p=0.06) and the left ventricular ejection fraction was not different between GI-A and GI-B, whereas it was lower in GI than in GII (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The data confirm that patients with left bundle branch block had decreased myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve and coronary flow reserve assessed by 82Rb-positron emission tomography imaging may be useful in identifying coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block.

Experiencia con Ecocardiograma de estrés dipiridamol y Reserva coronaria no invasiva: Comunicación preliminar / Dipyridamol Stress Echocardiography and Non-invasive Coronary Reserve: Preliminary report

Antecedentes: El Ecocardiograma de Estrés (EE) es una técnica ampliamente utilizada en el estudio de pacientes con Enfermedad Coronaria conocida o sospechada Recientemente se ha preconizado efectuar el test vasodilatador, método recomendado para evaluar no invasivamente la reserva de flujo coronario (RFC). Objetivos: Mostrar la experiencia preliminar con el EE Dipiridamol, con un seguimiento inicial, así como el estudio de la RFC en la porción distal de la arteria Descendente Anterior (ADA). Métodos: Se analizaron 164 pacientes (101 hombres, edad promedio 65 años) a los que se les efectuó un EE Dipiridamol entre Julio 2011 y Septiembre 2012, con una dosis de 0.84mg/kg en 6 minutos, que incluyó el estudio de RFC. Todos los pacientes completaron la prueba sin efectos secundarios significativos, y en un tiempo menor a 25 minutos. El seguimiento se hizo con miras a la aparición de eventos cardiovasculares mayores (revascularización, infarto al miocardio y muerte cardíaca). Resultados: EE resultó positivo para isquemia en 19 (21 por ciento) pacientes. En 19 (12 por ciento) el EE resultó alterado por motilidad parietal; 29 (15 por ciento) presentaron respuesta anormal en la RFC, con una coincidencia de 12 pacientes (7 por ciento) con ambos tipo de alteración; En 142 (88 por ciento) pacientes se logró medir la RFC en ADA. En 151 pacientes se obtuvo datos confiables del seguimiento, que fue en promedio 10 meses (6 a 18); entre estos, 10 pacientes tuvieron alguna revascularización. No hubo infartos ni fallecidos por causa cardio-vascular. Dado el corto período de seguimiento y baja incidencia de eventos, no se pudo establecer el valor predictivo del resultado de la prueba en esta muestra. Conclusiones: Esta experiencia permitió familiarizarse con la técnica del EE con Dipiridamol y estudiar en un alto porcentaje la RFC en la ADA. La técnica es segura y consume muy poco tiempo. Queda pendiente la determinación del valor predictivo de estos resultados en nuestras manos.

Background: Stress Echocardiography is a common technique in the study of patients with known or suspected Coronary artery disease (CAD). Recently the vasodilation test has been recommended for the non invasive study of Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR). Aim: to report our preliminary experience with Di-pyridamol Stress Echocardiography (DSE), an initial follow-up, and the study of CFR in the distal portion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Methods: 164 consecutive patients (101 men, mean age 65) with suspected or known CAD underwent a high-dose DSE (0.84 mg/kg over 6 min) between July 2011 and September 2012. The test included a study of CFR. All patients completed the test within 25 min. Prospective follow-up regarding major adverse cardiovascular events(revascularization, cardiac mortality and infarction) was conducted for a mean of 10 months (range 6-18) Results: DSE was positive for ischemia in 34 (21 percent) patients, showed abnormal wall motion in 19 (12 percent), abnormal CFR in 29 (15 percent) , and both abnormalities in12 (7 percent). 142 patients (88 percent) had a normal CFR in the LAD. 151 patients were followed for a mean of 10 months (6 to 18). Ten of these patients required some type of revascularization. There were no myocardial infarctions or cardiac deaths. Due to the short follow up period and the low incidence of events, it was not possible to estimate the predictive value of abnormal CFR. Conclusion: The dipyridamol echo stress test with a study of coronary flow reserve is safe and brief. The predictive value for cardiac events remains to be determined.

Pre-operative Tei Index does not predict left ventricular function immediately after mitral valve repair.

Echocardiographic assessment of systolic left ventricular (LV) function in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) undergoing mitral valve (MV) repair can be challenging because the measurement of ejection fraction (EF) or fractional area change (FAC) in pathological states is of questionable value. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of the pre-operative Tei Index in predicting left ventricular EF or FAC immediately after MV repair. One hundred and thirty patients undergoing MV repair with sinus rhythm pre- and post-operatively were enrolled in this prospective study. Twenty-six patients were excluded due to absence of sinus rhythm post-operatively. Standard transesophageal examination(IE 33,Philips,Netherlands) was performed before and after cardiopulmonary bypass according to the guidelines of the ASE/SCA. FAC was determined in the transgastric midpapillary short-axis view. LV EF was measured in the midesophageal four- and two-chamber view. For calculation of the Tei Index, the deep transgastric and the midesophageal four-chamber view were used. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 17.0. values are expressed as mean with standard deviation. LV FAC and EF decreased significantly after MV repair (FAC: 56±12% vs. 50±14%, P<0.001; EF: 58±11 vs. 50±12Έ P<0.001). The Tei Index decreased from 0.66±0.23 before MV repair to 0.41±0.19 afterwards (P<0.001). No relationship between pre-operative Tei Index and post-operative FAC or post-operative EF were found (FAC: r=−0.061, P=0.554; EF: r=−0.29, P=0.771). Conclusion: Pre-operative Tei Index is not a good predictor for post-operative FAC and EF in patients undergoing MV repair.

Qual o erro da angiografia na definição de isquemia miocárdica durante intervenções coronarianas percutâneas? / What is the angiography error when defining myocardial ischemia during percutaneous coronary interventions?

FUNDAMENTO: A angiografia vem sendo utilizada como padrão de referência para definição de doença arterial coronariana (DAC), embora suas limitações sejam conhecidas. O valor da medida do fluxo fracionado de reserva do miocárdio (FFR) na avaliação da DAC está bem estabelecido. OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar a acurácia da angiografia em definir as lesões isquêmicas e sua correlação com o FFR. MÉTODOS: Duzentos e cinqüenta pacientes foram incluídos no estudo (471 vasos). Todas as estenoses > 50 por cento pela estimativa visual da angiografia (EVA) foram avaliadas medindo-se o FFR. Se o FFR <0,75 a lesão foi tratada, se o FFR >0,75 a lesão não foi tratada. As lesões foram divididas em moderadas (<70 por cento - 327) e graves (125) pela QCA. Foram determinados o coeficiente de correlação entre o grau de estenose ( por centoDE), o FFR e a acurácia da EVA em definir se uma lesão era ou não isquêmica. RESULTADOS: Foi possível obter o FFR em 96 por cento das lesões. por centoDE e FFR médios de 56±8 por cento e 0,74 e 76±6 por cento e 0,48 para as lesões moderadas e graves respectivamente. Notou-se pobre correlação entre o por centoDE e o FFR, especialmente nas lesões moderadas (Spearman rho = - 0.33, p<0,0001). A acurácia da EVA comparada com FFR foi de 57 por cento e 96 por cento nas lesões moderadas versus graves. CONCLUSÃO: A angiografia coronária não é adequada para avaliar a importância funcional das lesões coronarianas, sendo necessário associá-la a um método funcional capaz de fazê-lo, especialmente nas lesões moderadas.

BACKGROUND: The angiography has been used as a reference standard to define coronary artery disease (CAD), although its limitations are well-known. The significance of the myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the assessment of CAD is well established. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of angiography when defining ischemic lesions and its correlation with FFR. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty consecutive patients (471 arteries) were included in this study. All stenoses > 50 percent at the angiography visual estimate (AVE) were assessed by FFR measurements. When FFR was < 0.75, stenting was performed; when FFR was > 0.75, no interventional treatment was carried out. Offline quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed in all stenoses, which were divided in intermediate (< 70 percent - 327) and severe (125). The correlation coefficients between the diameter of the stenosis ( percentDS) and FFR and the accuracy of VA of the angiography when assessing ischemia were determined. RESULTS: FFR could be obtained in 452 lesions (96 percent). Mean percentDS and FFR were 56 ± 8 percent and 0.74 and 76 ± 6 percent and 0.48 for moderate and severe stenoses, respectively. Concordance between QCA and FFR was poor, especially in intermediate stenoses (Spearman's rho = - 0.33, p<0.0001). Visual assessment resulted in an accuracy of 57 percent and 96 percent in intermediate and severe lesions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neither the visual assessment of an angiogram nor QCA can accurately predict the significance of most intermediate coronary stenoses, which emphasizes the importance of associating it to a functional evaluation of the coronary circulation, resulting in an adequate treatment of these stenoses.